|There but for a rare lucid moment on Roberts's part.|
(Image via bb: Tom the Dancing Bug)
“So often, Scalia has chosen to ignore the obligation of a Supreme Court justice to be, and appear to be, impartial. He’s turned “judicial restraint” into an oxymoronic phrase. But what he did this week, when the court announced its decision on the Arizona immigration law, should be the end of the line. ” (Washington Post)Yes. Yes, he should.